David Cameron

Date: 2013-04-10

Headline: Release the Home Office's Grooming Gang Review in full. Home office officials refuse to release the results of the muslim grooming gangs investigation, deciding it is not in 'Public interest' despite it being our children that are being raped! This is a list of those who opposed making this investigation public, thereby hiding the true extent of this crime, which is still going on today.

Corruption Level: 20

Content: MPs will debate e-petitions 300239 and 327566, relating to grooming gangs. Tom Hunt MP (Ipswich), member of the Petitions Committee, will lead the debate. The Government will send a Minister to respond. �Release the Home Office's Grooming Gang Review in full� The petition, which has more than 131,000 signatures, states: �The Government is refusing to release official research on the characteristics of grooming gangs, claiming it is not in the �public interest�. �We, the British public, demand the release of the official research on grooming gangs undertaken by the Government in full.� In response to the petition, the Government said: �Government intends to publish a paper on group-based child sexual exploitation this year, which will set out key findings of the Home Office�s work in this area and implications for policy.� We the British People Request a Public Inquiry into Grooming Gangs The petition, which has more than 29,000 signatures, states: �The Home Secretary said what happened to victims of child sexual exploitation gangs was �one of the biggest stains on our country�s conscience.� Last year local authorities identified 18,700 suspected victims of child sexual exploitation. We want an independent public inquiry into Grooming Gangs.� In response to the petition, the Government said: �The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse is already examining institutional responses to sexual exploitation by organised networks. The Home Office also intends to publish a paper on this issue.� The debate will provide opportunities for MPs to question Government Ministers directly on these issues. The debate will be available to watch live on Parliament TV and will follow the conclusion of business relating to statutory instruments on Wednesday. Since it was established in 2015, the Petitions Committee has regularly organised debates in Parliament�s second debating Chamber, Westminster Hall. The Committee scheduled its first ever debate in the House of Commons Chamber in June 2020 during last year�s closure of Westminster Hall.

Outcome: We are still waiting for the government to release details of the muslim grooming gangs, which is estimated so far to include 30,000 young girls and 1000's of muslim men. Nearly all of these young children are white, and all were living in poor conditions generated by the local Labour authority. The government have shown over and over again to have no intention of releasing the true scale of these horrendous crimes. Most of our politicians from all sides of the house also have no interest in protecting our young children - especially not the ones who directly or indirectly benefit from these muslim men.

Date: 2016-11-28

Headline: All MPs and Civil Servants who tried to frustrate or cancel BREXIT.

Corruption Level: 10

Content:

These MPs, Civil Servants, and public figures all tried to cancel the referendum result of (so called) BREXIT despite the votes being counted and all legal paths were followed correctly. Predictably the voters for Yes (leave the political block that has become the EU) were branded "Racists", "Xenophobes" (and other racial slurs) as well as being labelled "Stupid", "Didn't know what they were voting for", "shouldn't have been allowed to vote", etc.

Below are some quotes from those that stand out as they most extreme insults, slurs, and basically childish outcry's from those on the opposite side.

John Longworth, the former head of the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC), said europhiles were being "disingenuous" with their claims that people did not understand quitting the EU would also mean leaving the single market. The influential business figure highlighted four unequivocal comments from the most senior campaigners on both sides of the argument which made it "absolutely clear" that would be the case.

His remarks came as new Lib Dem MP Sarah Olney sparked outrage by insisting there should be a second referendum because people did not know what they were voting for. The newly-installed Richmond Park representative had to be humiliatingly pulled from a car crash radio interview when she was quizzed about the claim and failed to answer even the most basic questions about the EU.

And firmly rebutting her claim today, Mr Longworth highlighted four crystal clear statements - two from Remainers David Cameron and George Osborne, and two from Brexiteers Nigel Farage and Michael Gove - confirming Brexit meant leaving the single market.

David Cameron, June 12 "The British public would be voting, if we Leave, to leave the EU and leave the Single Market."

George Osborne, June 8 "We'd be out of the Single Market, that�s the reality, Britain would be quitting, quitting the Single Market."

Michael Gove, May 8 "We should be outside the Single Market."

Nigel Farage, February 22 "I don't want to be part of the European Single Market, I want Britain to leave the European Union, be an independent country and trade with the world".

Mr Longworth, who was controversially ousted from his post at the BCC after declaring for Brexit, said Remoaners should now "accept the verdict of the British people".

He said "Remain and Leave campaigners were absolutely clear before the referendum that Leave meant leaving the Single Market".

"They were right. Leaving the Single Market is the only way we can take back control of our laws, our borders and our money."

"And any attempt by 'Remain' to now claim you didn't know what you were voting for is entirely disingenuous."

"We urge those who supported Remain not to seek to delay, obstruct or dilute the Brexit process � but to accept the verdict of the British people and embrace the huge opportunities on the horizon for a free and independent United Kingdom."

Outcome: Ongoing

David Cameron Conservative MP